|
|
Gales Creek Large Woody Debris Inventory Report
Methods |
|
LWD surveys in five reaches of Gales Creek were conducted
using methods developed for habitat restoration by the
California Department of Fish and Game (Flosi et al.
1998). Selected survey reaches were divided into 200-ft
intervals and one thousand feet of each reach were surveyed
for LWD, except for GL06 which was only 900 ft in length
and GL09 where 1,100 ft were surveyed (Table
1; Figure
1). In reaches greater than 1,000 ft (GL02, GL08 and
GL09), a minimum of five intervals were randomly selected
for sampling (Table 1; Figure
1). This design allows
for comparison of each 200 ft section of stream as a
replicate, and the surveyed segments of each reach can
be combined to make generalizations about each reach.
Every linear foot of each reach was not surveyed, thus
LWD, debris jams, weirs and other observations within
the reaches may have not been counted in these surveys.
These items were counted within the surveyed 200 ft
segments only. Data were tallied and averaged for each
reach individually and combined for an overall analysis
of wood in the surveyed reaches.
Surveyors traveled upstream through each reach with
a hip chain, marking habitat units (pools, riffles and
glides) and tallying all LWD pieces. Each piece of wood ≥ 1
foot in diameter and ≥ 6 feet in length and root
wads ≥ 1 foot were tallied. Wood pieces and trees
within the recruitment zone were also tallied and characterized
as live or dead. Live trees were further characterized
as being coniferous or deciduous. Debris jams, defined
as aggregations of three or more pieces of wood, were
located, photographed and noted. Other observations
such as the occurrence of beaver dams were also recorded.
In addition to the methods outlined in Flosi et al.
(1998), steps were taken to better support the objectives
of this study and the Gales Creek watershed. Crews recorded
habitat units where debris jams occurred and noted if
the jam marked a change in habitat type. Habitat units
were defined according to ODFW’s Methods for Stream
Habitat Surveys (Leader 2002). The recruitment zone
for live trees was defined as 50 feet from the bankfull
edge for the survey. Water and air temperature were
taken at the beginning of each survey with a handheld
thermometer.
Crews recorded the location of the downstream and
upstream end of reach and any debris jams by averaging
the location on a Garmin 12 handheld GPS unit. Field
workers took photos facing into the reach from the downstream
and upstream ends and also photographed any notable
features (beaver dams, diversions, etc.) throughout
the sampled reaches.
Waypoints from the handheld GPS units were
overlain on a 2003 color aerial photo of the study area,
provided by April Olbrich of the TRWC, in ArcMap 9.1.
Point data were joined with a database of the results
of the LWD census to create maps for this report.
|